Frisiangal
Well-known member
No. ADHD is not autism, although both can exist in the same person. And both are neuroatypicalities.
Final question. Do you consider the highlighted to fall under Mercury alone, and/or/with Uranus accentuated?
No. ADHD is not autism, although both can exist in the same person. And both are neuroatypicalities.
Hello
Are there any typical placements or aspects which suggests that the native is on the autism spectrum?
Thank you for that fact of which I was unaware.
Many mental health name terms have been changed to their advantage over the years, making them sound less severe in nature.
Having also answered Osamenor's most recent post, does this mean that AD(H)D also falls under H.F.A, and is not separate from it?
(A lot of head scratching going on now.)
Final question. Do you consider the highlighted to fall under Mercury alone, and/or/with Uranus accentuated?
But my thought is that Uranus would be accentuated in most or maybe all cases. What better way to suggest there's something markedly atypical about this person?
Something I have noticed is that in those cases, more often than not, there's a Uranus/Sun aspect.
My boyfriend is asperger, I have ADHD.
Looking through I see Autism with other neurodivergent(s). A third of those with Autism will have comorbidity. I would take an educated guess and say that some of this third was probably also misdiagnosed at first, if not more.
So, where would aspects overlap behavioral profiles?
And, where do they fit on the spectrum?
And, what area does it effect the most?
These are the areas looked at:
Sensory Processing
Information Processing
Language and Development
Memory
Attention Regulation
Emotional Regulation
I was also wonder if a midpoint chart would be important given that autism is about too much or too little. Maybe a midpoint chart would show high concentrations or a lack thereof? Just a thought.
Are you referring to astro. aspects here?
Perhaps member Cary is the person to approach here, who says to work with midpoints.
Cary2, as an ex-psychologist I found myself nodding in agreement throughout your post (though Vaknin himself is vexing as a self-proclaimed narcissist). It’s very difficult to work with labels and fatalistic containers such as disorders, particularly those that are as you say reimbursement constructs. Planetary aspects are more helpful in illustrating tendencies and remedies. If you have remedial ideas from your work with midpoints I would be very curious to hear them.
Autism/Aspergers/etc. is indicated by Neptune aspects, likely squares. A Jupiter-Neptune square would be an indicator ("too much [Jupiter] in the dream world [Neptune]"). Generally, autistic traits are in the "dreaminess" realm, which is Neptune. I speak from experience.
I think you are right. Martin Seymour-Smith offered "mystery-illnesses" as a keyword for the Jupiter/Neptune combination.
I'm a female diagnosed with autism (formerly aspergers), and ADHD.
Here is my chart for anyone interested:
The main points of interest are probably the capricorn stellium in the 3rd and 4th houses that includes mars, mercury, uranus, neptune, and sun, with saturn also in the 4th house, but in aquarius. My moon in cancer in the 10th house opposes this stellium. Pluto is in scorpio in my first house, trine with the moon. Jupiter in virgo in 12th house trine neptune, uranus, and mercury.
If anyone has any thoughts on my chart and the connection to ADHD/autism please feel free to share them.
My first impression from your description (which is much inferior to a chart for analysis) is that one could easily mistake you for someone who is intellectually brilliant and possessing a rich imagination. The Moon opposition and the Fourth House Saturn might suggest a burden from genetics.
Being intellectually brilliant and possessing a rich imagination is not mutually exclusive with ADHD and autism. In fact, those are key traits.
So, logically, we should expect to get an impression of intellectual brilliance and rich imagination in the chart of anyone with either or both of those diagnoses.
I agree, and it was my point, but it makes me still more hesitant to accept the arbitrary nature of "disorder" research.
If that was your point, why did you say, "mistaken for"? There's nothing to mistake.
What's arbitrary is calling it a disorder. Homosexuality used to be known as a disorder, too.
Similarly, people ask if there are "gay" markers in a birth chart. Arguably, there are, but the same markers appear in the charts of straight people too. And when we look for astrological markers of neuroatypicality, we may find some that appear time and again, but they also appear for neurotypical people.
Everything astrological can manifest in a variety of ways.