I never said good looks and physical attraction aren't the priority. But status and wealth is something women look for in a man. In fact most of you gals have already said so.
Nope. I have NEVER said so. In fact I have been very adamant since the beginning that status and wealth matter nothing to me at all. Yes, some of us did say we prefer a man who has a job, however this has absolutely nothing to do with status/wealth. You keep conflating these two things, despite being shown and told numerous times that you are wrong. Yet you keep braying. Why?
A man having a job is not the same as him having wealth. Are you able to comprehend this? I mean, at all?
You may not want to accept it but "character" has nothing to do with good looks. Ergo, when you are looking for a guy that has "character" its not based on his physical appearence. You describe a form of character which begins with his hard work, ergo, his general ability to generate wealth and sustain himself, unlike many other men.
I never said character is a part of good looks. I also did not imply that there are only four things in determining a female's attraction, namely, looks, charm, money, and status. I realize and fully acknowledge that attraction is multi-faceted. The reason I even started talking about character is because you kept crying about how we women want a guy with a job is because we want wealth, and I wanted to tell you that you are wrong.
I really think that for you to keep insisting women want wealth in a man, it really tells us a lot about your mentality. It's almost like you feel the
need to believe that women look for status and wealth in a man. I wonder why.
That is a form of status for himself, because he is above all men than can't do that.
Having character is NOT a form of status, no matter how hard you try to spin it. It's entertaining to watch you try, though.
Again, whether you want to accept it or not, you are looking for men that have qualities unrelated to appearence.
And? I never said looks and game are the only things that matter.
Wan, no ones cares about your failed love story. If you don't want to tell it thats is totally fine by me. But don't request me to provide an opinion on your love life, if you are unable to tell it in details.
It is a silly request to do so.
-----
Give me your g*dd*mn email address. I will email you the whole story right now.
He/She said his dad was wealthy. Regardless of how much it might have been, it implies he had more money than the mother at the time they got married. Which means she got half of it, or at least a portion.
Ergo the marriage increased her own wealth significantly,
Nope. The marriage increased her mother's wealth, yes, but you can't say significantly, because you don't know how much wealth her father had at the beginning. You like to hallucinate, though.
and now she doesn't have to care for status or wealth, and can simply bang whoever she wants based on looks, not caring about financial security.
Whether it was a rational or irrational business decison, we won't know, we just know that is what she did. We'll never know what goes on in her head, we just know her actions. And her actions were finding wealth and security.
So what? A lot of women marry out of financial considerations. Doesn't mean that they are genuinely attracted to their husbands. And in this thread, we are talking about what women are attracted to, NOT what they look for in a marriage partner. You keep crying about how some women look for wealth and status, which I never ever even disputed. But I keep telling you that this only tells us what women consider when marrying, but it tells us nothing about what they are genuinely attracted to. You seem to be saying that just because women look for wealth and status in a husband, that means they are genuinely attracted to these things. This is over-simplified thinking on your part.
Can you tell me why you think women are genuinely attracted to status and wealth? Is it because you see some women marry rich, high-status men, and you think in your mind that this must mean they are attracted to these traits? Is it possible, at all, that some women marry rich, high-status men
despite having no attraction for them? Your utter inability to realize this shows your total lack of understanding of how the world works, and by extension, the female mind. It truly astounds me that you can't tell marriage and genuine attraction apart. You apparently do not realize some women (and sometimes, some men) do not marry for love/attraction.
Dirius sure loves doing this. It's in his blood.
