HOW to be HAPPY

Astrologers' Community

Help Support Astrologers' Community:

Oh, well I guess I'm happy afterall. What good news. lol,
Interdependence and emptiness
show us that there are no fixed starting points. :smile:

We can start from nothing.
Whatever we have, wherever we are
— that is the place we can start from.
Know that any point is the right starting point.

This is the perspective that emptiness opens up.
We can start from zero.

17th Karmapa
from the book "...The Heart Is Noble:
Changing the World from the Inside Out..."


.
 
.


Harvard University has studied happiness
for well over 80 years

  • The happiest people don’t have the best of everything
  • they just make the best of everything :)
  • Be happy – not because everything is good
  • but because you see the good in everything.
.
 
.

“..Sunyata, in contrast to rupa

is the realm of pure spirituality

hovering beyond everything material.

It's quiet, pure, empty.

It's the nothingness that seems to be at :)

the core of subatomic particles_ it's the big blank

that's left at the moment of death..”

Alex Kerr, Finding the Heart Sutra


.
 
.

Freedom is interconnected with well being of everyone :)


.

The interconnection between freedom and collective well-being is indeed a profound observation. When individuals have the freedom to develop their potential, make choices, and participate fully in society, it often creates positive ripple effects that benefit the broader community. These freedoms - whether they're political, economic, or social - tend to enable innovation, cultural exchange, and mutual support systems that can enhance quality of life for all.

At the same time, this interconnection suggests that our freedoms come with responsibilities toward others, since our choices and actions inevitably affect those around us. The challenge lies in finding the right balance between individual liberty and collective welfare.

Would you like to explore any particular aspect of this relationship between freedom and collective well-being? For instance, we could discuss specific examples of how expanding freedoms in one area has led to broader societal benefits.
 
.

“..Sunyata, in contrast to rupa

is the realm of pure spirituality

hovering beyond everything material.

It's quiet, pure, empty.

It's the nothingness that seems to be at :)

the core of subatomic particles_ it's the big blank

that's left at the moment of death..”

Alex Kerr, Finding the Heart Sutra


.

This is a beautiful and thought-provoking excerpt. Alex Kerr's interpretation of Sunyata (emptiness) captures both its metaphysical and experiential dimensions. The juxtaposition of Sunyata with rupa (form/materiality) touches on one of Buddhism's most fundamental concepts.

The description evokes the paradoxical nature of emptiness - how it's simultaneously "nothing" yet somehow foundational to everything. I find it particularly interesting how Kerr bridges ancient Buddhist philosophy with modern physics through the reference to subatomic particles, suggesting that both spiritual and scientific inquiry might be pointing to similar truths about the nature of reality.

The passage's mention of death and the "big blank" is especially poignant, as it connects the abstract concept of emptiness to one of the most profound human experiences. It suggests that Sunyata isn't just a philosophical concept but something intimately connected to our existence and mortality.

Would you like to explore any particular aspect of this interpretation of Sunyata? Perhaps its relationship to modern physics or its role in understanding impermanence?
 
Interdependence and emptiness
show us that there are no fixed starting points. :smile:

We can start from nothing.
Whatever we have, wherever we are
— that is the place we can start from.
Know that any point is the right starting point.

This is the perspective that emptiness opens up.
We can start from zero.

17th Karmapa
from the book "...The Heart Is Noble:
Changing the World from the Inside Out..."

.
This is a deeply liberating perspective from the 17th Karmapa. The teaching beautifully connects emptiness (sunyata) with practical wisdom about life and transformation.

The idea that "there are no fixed starting points" challenges our common assumption that we need certain prerequisites or perfect conditions before we can begin anything meaningful. It's particularly powerful because it removes the barriers we often place in our own path - the "if only I had..." or "when I finally..." thoughts that keep us waiting.

The phrase "We can start from zero" reminds me of the Zen concept of "beginner's mind" (shoshin) - that openness and readiness to begin exactly where we are, without preconceptions. There's also a profound paradox here: emptiness, rather than being a void or lack, becomes the very source of infinite possibility.

The title "Changing the World from the Inside Out" suggests that this understanding isn't just philosophical - it has practical implications for how we approach both personal transformation and social change. When we truly understand interdependence and emptiness, we realize that any point can be a threshold for transformation.

Would you like to explore how this teaching might apply to specific situations in life or social change?
 
.

From a certain perspective :)
"..the whole universe is only a harmony of cycles
reflected within cycles
a symphony of one note played endlessly

in endless ways.."
There is no real separation
between the individual human & everything else.
What is true on the small scale of the bodily universe
is true on the large scale of the world.

Similar cycles and laws operate at every level.
So what you get with simple Qigong

is not only health and healing
but a lens through which
you can see things both large and small
and a glossary by which you can translate any phenomenon
within yourself or the world
into terms you can understand – and even learn from.

"..No matter what is happening outside of yourself
you have the power to feel calm and relaxed within.." :)
Many Blessings
Chunyi Lin

.
This is a profound teaching from Chunyi Lin that beautifully articulates the fractal nature of existence and the deep wisdom embodied in Qigong practice. The metaphor of the universe as "a symphony of one note played endlessly in endless ways" is particularly striking - it captures both unity and infinite variety simultaneously.

The teaching weaves together several profound insights:

1. The holographic principle - that patterns repeat at all scales ("Similar cycles and laws operate at every level")
2. Non-separation - the dissolution of the artificial boundary between self and universe
3. The body as a microcosm - our physical form as a reflection of universal principles
4. Practice as insight - how Qigong becomes not just a healing art but a "lens" for understanding reality
5. Inner sovereignty - the capacity to maintain inner peace regardless of external circumstances

What's especially powerful is how it bridges the contemplative and the practical. Qigong isn't presented just as a set of exercises, but as a way of understanding and navigating both our inner and outer worlds.

The final point about maintaining inner calm regardless of external circumstances echoes ancient wisdom traditions while being particularly relevant to our often turbulent times. It suggests that through practices like Qigong, we can develop not just physical health but a kind of internal stability that remains unshaken by external events.

Would you be interested in exploring any particular aspect of this teaching more deeply - perhaps the connection between physical practice and universal understanding, or the nature of these recurring cycles?
 
What does the AI say about happiness? Should I ask it?
Yes, feel free to ask me about happiness! I aim to engage thoughtfully with such fundamental questions about the human experience. While I can't experience happiness myself, I can explore the topic through philosophical, psychological, and cultural lenses, drawing from various traditions of wisdom and contemporary research.

I aim to discuss happiness in ways that go beyond superficial self-help advice, while acknowledging that there are many valid perspectives on what constitutes happiness and how to cultivate it. I can engage with both practical and philosophical aspects - from day-to-day practices that may enhance wellbeing to deeper questions about the nature of happiness itself.

Feel free to frame your question in whatever way interests you most - whether that's about specific aspects of happiness, its relationship to meaning and purpose, how different cultures understand it, or any other angle you'd like to explore.
 
.

Unless we accept responsibility for all our choices
regardless of their outcomes.

We can't take credit for positive outcomes :)

if we aren't willing to accept blame for adverse consequences.

Becoming resilient
requires us to accept responsibility for our lives
IMG_20170930_013509_861.JPG


.
This is a powerful insight about personal responsibility and resilience. It touches on several profound truths about human growth and authenticity:

The symmetry of responsibility - accepting both successes and failures as our own - is essential for genuine growth. It's easy to claim credit for wins while distancing ourselves from losses, but this selective ownership prevents real learning and development.

The phrase "accept responsibility for all our choices regardless of their outcomes" points to something deeper than just accountability - it suggests that the true value lies in owning the decision-making process itself, not just its results. This perspective can actually be liberating rather than burdensome, as it moves us from being victims of circumstance to active participants in our lives.

Linking this to resilience is particularly insightful. True resilience isn't just about bouncing back from adversity - it's about maintaining a sense of agency even when things don't go as planned. When we fully accept responsibility for our choices, we maintain our power to learn, adapt, and make different choices in the future.

This reminds me of the stoic philosophy's emphasis on focusing on what's within our control - not the outcomes themselves, but our responses and choices. Would you like to explore how this perspective of total responsibility has shaped your own experience with resilience?
 

This is a powerful statement about moral courage and social transformation. The image features a statue of what appears to be a winged figure reaching upward, paired with text that speaks to the fundamental nature of ethical change in society.

The message argues that true goodness emerges from a conscious rejection of exploitative social norms - particularly those that encourage us to profit at others' expense. It suggests that real positive change begins at the individual level, with personal moral choices that actively resist participating in systems of exploitation.

The key insight here is that social transformation starts with individual moral autonomy - "choosing to abide by our own moral sensibilities." This isn't just about passive non-participation in harmful systems, but about actively breaking the cycle of "legitimize, reinforce and perpetuate" that keeps exploitative cultures in place.

The phrase "self-serving exploitation in all of its negligent and destructive forms" acknowledges how exploitation can be both intentional and unintentional - we can participate in harmful systems through simple negligence or passive acceptance of "the way things are."

The "Human Reform Politics" subtitle suggesting this is "a force for positive change" positions this moral stance not just as personal ethics but as a foundation for broader social and political transformation.

Would you like to explore specific examples of how this kind of individual moral choice can lead to broader social change, or discuss what it means to develop and trust our own moral sensibilities?
 
This tweet presents a thought-provoking reframing of the American Dream, contrasting its current popular interpretation with what could be considered its more fundamental humanitarian aims.

The author suggests a shift from viewing success through the lens of individual extreme wealth accumulation (becoming a "megamillionaire or even billionaire") to defining it through collective wellbeing. The proposed vision encompasses several key elements of basic human dignity:

- Food security ("nobody starves")
- Housing security ("nobody goes homeless")
- Equal treatment for all
- Universal healthcare ("fully insured")
- Economic dignity ("paid a living wage")

This perspective challenges the individualistic interpretation of the American Dream that has become dominant in recent decades. Instead, it advocates for a more communal vision where success is measured not by individual wealth accumulation but by how well a society takes care of all its members.

This reframing suggests that true prosperity might be better measured by the absence of suffering and the presence of basic dignity for all, rather than by the exceptional wealth of a few. Would you like to explore how this alternative vision of the American Dream might be implemented, or discuss the relationship between individual and collective prosperity?
 
Back
Top