how to read those aspects

Astrologers' Community

Help Support Astrologers' Community:

helahell

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2023
Messages
8
Hi,
I've just started learning astrology and have some difficulties with my natal aspects.
 
Last edited:
Hi,
I've just started learning astrology and have some difficulties with my natal aspects.



First one is Moon-Saturn thing.
I have two aspects there and I am confused which one is more influencial:
1. Moon (Scorpio in 7th house, Placidus system) square Saturn (Aquarius in 12th house) -> 6 degree 11 ' applying
2. Moon parallel Saturn 0 degree 37' applying

1678481492258.png


Second one is closer in terms of degrees, but parallels seems to be secondary aspects and I'm confused. Another thing is I read that parallels works like conjunction but beneficiary, but Moon con Saturn is not beneficiary in any ways. How to read it?

Second one is Moon-Mars:
Moon square Mars (Cancer in 5th house) - 9 degree 26' separating

How strong is this aspect? Mars in Cancer seems to be weak and there is more than 9 degrees difference. And - how this aspect work? Interpretations I read suggest strong, agressive Mars, but Mars in Cancer lacks those traits.
 
Hi,
I've just started learning astrology and have some difficulties with my natal aspects.
Second one is Moon-Mars:
Moon square Mars (Cancer in 5th house) - 9 degree 26' separating
Influence aka impact of PLANETS
includes effects of TRANSITS


BOTH natal and transits impact are partially dependent on HOUSE LOCATION :)
i.e.
houses are defined as
angular - 1st, 4th, 7th & 10th
succeedent - 2nd, 5th, 8th, & 11th
and
cadent - 3rd, 6th, 9th & 12th as shown in the diagram

The houses are not all equal in strength and power.


angular, succeedent, cadent
If a planet is located in an angular house,
it is much more forceful
in its effects than it would be in a cadent house.
On page 48 of Christian Astrology Lilly writes:
The angles are most powerful, the succeedents are next in virtue, the cadents poor, and of little efficacy

In force and virtue they stand so in order:
1 10 7 4 11 5 9 3 2 8 6 12

The meaning whereof is this, that two planets equally dignified
the one in the Ascendant, the other in the tenth house
you shall judge the planet in the Ascendant somewhat of more power
to effect what he is significator of

than he that is in the tenth: do so in the rest as they stand in order
remembering that planets in angles do more forcibly show their effects.

The astrological angles - ascendant, midheaven (MC), descendant and lower midheaven (IC)
- are the most potent and influential areas in any chart.
Any planet that is in conjunction with an angle
will have a marked influence that resonates throughout the chart and greatly colours its overall meaning.
Deborah Houlding




25 August 2022 An introduction to transits in astrology
which is one of the primary timing techniques
that astrologers use to make predictions

with astrologers Chris Brennan and Leisa Schaim


How strong is this aspect? Mars in Cancer seems to be weak and there is more than 9 degrees difference. And - how this aspect work? Interpretations I read suggest strong, agressive Mars, but Mars in Cancer lacks those traits.

:)
 
So, if I understand correctly: Saturn has little impact on Moon, because it's in cedent house and Mars has an average.
None of them are close to MC-IC Asc-Desc lines, so I shouldn't worry about them much?


Please be aware that JupiterASC is a tradition/helenistic astrologer.
Modern astrologers might have a different opinion. I sent you a PM.
keep in mind that astrologers have differing opinions
Modernist astrologers frequently disagree amongst themselves :)

Astrological data are highly sensitive.

Please know that you should take your own risks
if you decide to trust someone else with their astrological services,
as this forum does not undertake any responsibility for any astrological services,
especially those offered against a fee, via this forum in any form:

through public forums or chat, private messages or emails. :)

Also remember that this is a public forum, indexed by search engines (Google, for instance),

so basically everything you post here is not only viewable by any other person,
but it also can be retrieved by a simple internet search.

.
 
Last edited:
Hi,
I've just started learning astrology and have some difficulties with my natal aspects.

First one is Moon-Saturn thing.
I have two aspects there and I am confused which one is more influencial:
1. Moon (Scorpio in 7th house, Placidus system) square Saturn (Aquarius in 12th house) -> 6 degree 11 ' applying
2. Moon parallel Saturn 0 degree 37' applying

Second one is closer in terms of degrees, but parallels seems to be secondary aspects and I'm confused. Another thing is I read that parallels works like conjunction but beneficiary, but Moon con Saturn is not beneficiary in any ways. How to read it?

Second one is Moon-Mars:
Moon square Mars (Cancer in 5th house) - 9 degree 26' separating

How strong is this aspect? Mars in Cancer seems to be weak and there is more than 9 degrees difference. And - how this aspect work? Interpretations I read suggest strong, agressive Mars, but Mars in Cancer lacks those traits.
Your Moon is not comfortable expressing itself, your inner feeling life, because it is in Scorpio, so in its depression or fall. Saturn is strong in its dignity. Moon aspects Saturn both by square and is pretty closely parallel. So Saturn's inhibiting influence, and whatever other symbolism you may learn about Saturn, will apply here. Since there is a square, Saturn's influence, the lesson's that Saturn will teach you, may have something of an ambush feel, kind of out of the blue. So I would say you have a strong Saturn influence on your Moon heightened by a wider square aspect and also by their being parallel, which is typically only by close orb, like a degree or degree and a half. I think the square is more influential.

Regarding Moon Mars, I do not see a square. Being out of sign and so far apart, I see a trine by sign. Moon is unhappy in Scorp by essential dignity as mentioned above, being in its depression or fall, and Mars is unhappy, also in its depression in Cancer. But they like each other, support each other by mutual reception, each being in the sign of the other's dignity and also in trine by sign. I don't see that Mars harms Moon, but rather is supportive [to the limited extent that it is able while being in its fall itself] by reception and by trine.

Lots of moving parts. Such fun.
 
Last edited:
Your chart is clear in that it says you are EXTREMELY conflicted. One conflict is between the "attachment/detachment" dynamic.
Freedom vs security....which rarely goes together....unless you are OK being alone...
which you are not.
So you need to examine and research your conflict sources...usually beginning in the original home. That is where we all learn the "negative laws" and you have learned many of them.
LIN
 
Last edited:
Your chart is clear in that it says you are EXTREMELY conflicted.
I absolutely disagree!
Mars, although weak by sign, is trine Pluto, Mercury and the Sun, and all four of these planets are trine the Ascendant, forming a Grand Trine. This indicates a lot of positive masculine energy, both physically and psychically. Despite what some here may say, a Grand Trine is extremely harmonious and provides a constructive lifelong base to work from. Jupiter is trine Saturn, indicating a balanced mind, neither too liberal nor too conservative (not speaking in political terms, but in a psychological sense). The Moon is sextile Venus, giving a sympathetic and open nature and generally good relations with the opposite sex. Neptune in the 11th house is sextile Pluto in the 8th, with the possibility of sympathetic, insightful, and most likely eccentric (due to Uranus conjunction) friends that can be a link to hidden resources (of emotional power, money, support). All of these are especially harmonious and offer opportunities, right now, in the present.
Yes, there is the Moon applying square to Saturn, which has a depressive effect on the mind and emotions, and possibly health. Moon square Mars IMO is out of orb, and certainly less potent than these positive aspects.
 
The chart presented is by no means what most astrologers would consider highly conflicted.
Since the matter was not brought up by the OP, there is no need to bring in any other topics, like transits, to respond to the initial questions.
Occasionally it happens that posters tout their knowledge to newcomers of a forum, or even deliberately attempt to confuse them. Remember that most of the astrologers here are not professionals, and many are actually beginners like yourself.
Therefore, my personal advice would be, take a lot of what you read here with a grain of salt, and if you want to learn, get a couple of good books on astrology and go from there.
 
I was thinking maybe there is nothing in astrology
There is plenty in astrology, but some astrologers may (shall we say) not do the discipline justice.

As Hippocrates (who was a physician and astrologer) said,
Art is long,
Life is short,
Opportunity fleeting,
Experiment dangerous,
Judgment difficult.


The astrological art is very long indeed. Lots of people who have been involved many years admit they are still working at it (myself included of course).
Moon applying to conjunction with Uranus (orb 3:06).
 
The study of astrology, whether your own chart or someone else's, is not for everyone.

In order to read a chart (and your own chart is the hardest to read) one must be able to be absolutely honest with oneself, and be detached enough to see one's own character, traits, shortcomings, skills, gifts, personality... - and .this takes time.
Because if the word "conflict" is difficult for anyone "own", it's hard to read ANY chart...because I have never read a chart (in over 40 years) which did not have some conflict in it.

And then there are the transits....which can bring conflict into a previously peaceful area of one's life.
When one is angry, sad, ambiguous, depressed, ill....there are going to be squares, inconjuncts, oppositions, in the chart.

It's always best to use several sources of the really respected basic astrology books ...the basics allow one to get used to the language of astrology....and the symbolism.

It's very common when beginning to read about your own chart to feel defensive.. That is why it's a good idea to get the opinions of several real astrologers....most astrologers will agree with the interpretation of any particular chart...even if they use different methods to do the interpretations.

LIN
 
I agree it is not easy to be clear enough, quiet enough inside, to read what a horoscope shows. It also takes time to process.
 
Well, all squares represent some sort of conflict.....that is what a square IS...that is what it represents...because the signs which are 90 degrees apart are not compatible. It's like 2 people who are very different trying to work together...and they don't have the same skills, the same values, the same impulses, the same goals. They will conflict. Because they are SO different....one will always want to be "in charge". Saturn will usually win. But the other planet will feel unexpressed. Hence, internal conflict of some sort....

If you can find any source which says that a square does not have a conflict dynamic, I would be happy to see it.
LIN
 
If you can find any source which says that a square does not have a conflict dynamic, I would be happy to see it.
I don't think anyone said a square wasn't a hard aspect.
I don't think Kosmobiologie recognizes anything but hard angles.
 
not necessarily. Squares are an obstacle in front of you preventing you from going where you want to go. You will have to expend more energy to deal with it, by climbing over it, pushing through it, or going around it. The good thing is that you can see it, and it doesn’t come back. An opposition is like a glass ceiling, you don’t see the obstacle until you bump into it, and working harder won’t fix it--you need to do something different. An inconjucnt is like a square obstacle that you see ahead and its 4 feet high, but when you get there its actually 12 feet high.
I would frame the square and opposition like this: In my experience, the square is a blindsiding aspect. It comes out of nowhere from the side, at 90 degrees; you don't see it. It's like being hit broadside at an obscured intersection.
The opposition is right in front of you. It's an oppositional by nature. But you see it.

I'll take an opposition any day over a square.
 
" Squares are an obstacle in front of you preventing you from going where you want to go. You will have to expend more energy to deal with it, by climbing over it, pushing through it, or going around it."

I'm confused: is this not one of the exact definitions of conflict? What else would call it? And when I said "conflict" ....maybe didn't make myself clear...I meant "internal" conflict. Obstacles...which you must navigate using your natural energy...but that energy is not easy access (that would be a trine)....so conflict.

And yes, you DO see the square...like the closet you open and suddenly you realize you have been stuffing things into the closet without examining each thing and deciding where it should go... and then everything comes tumbling out...and you say....OH SH__! NOw I have to deal with all this stuff...I didn't know where to put it...so I just shoved it in the closet...."
The amount of psychic detritus that builds up varies from person to person...and the strength of their Neptune...which can keep them in the dark for a long time....(another subject.) Most people do not recognize the repetitious dynamic of the square....we think..."I just have to get thru this...then I'll relax"....but ...not so much.

We all do this. Bits and pieces of stuff we don't want to deal with because decisions are required...we are conflicted about what to DO with these things. So we stuff them away. Until some heavy transits comes along....or even a not so heavy transit comes along...and we can't ignore the stuff anymore.

More personal planetary squares are energies that we have to deal with since birth....so by the time we are 5 or 6 or so we have already learned a LOT of lessons about how to deal with conflicting energies in our lives... and take them for granted.

Oppositions are aspects we think comes from an outside source (another person, an event, etc) ...but really it's also a look in the mirror....this is what we attract/ed. These are our choices....this is where we get to make decisions...this or that. Not both at the same time.
Some times these choices are relatively easy....each month the moon makes all the aspects to every planet in our chart...so these daily decisions we usually handle with little thought ...that they are, in fact, choices....choices we can change if we want...most people live a large part of their lives on automatic pilot ...because unless one has NO fixity or Virgo or Cancer in their chart....except a house cusp (not an angle) we tend to make the same (subliminal or unconscious) decisions over and over...we call them "habit."

The INCONJUNCT....which I have studied for decades....is a subject for another thread....:unsure:

LIN
 
Calling squares a 'conflict' can create negative influences within an individual hearing it as an effect within themselves.
Use the word 'challenge' and it creates a different and more positive meaning.
As a client many moons ago phoned back to say, 'IT WORKS, IT WORKS.'

Moon-Saturn are natural antagonists. O.P's Moon square Saturn becomes the challenge of insight between inner feelings and their effect upon outer manifestations .....or vice versa.

:smile:
 
Calling squares a 'conflict' can create negative influences within an individual hearing it as an effect within themselves.
Use the word 'challenge' and it creates a different and more positive meaning.
As a client many moons ago phoned back to say, 'IT WORKS, IT WORKS.'

Moon-Saturn are natural antagonists. O.P's Moon square Saturn becomes the challenge of insight between inner feelings and their effect upon outer manifestations .....or vice versa.

:smile:
LOL... I use the words that fit my definition of the way I see the aspects.... in over 40 years of my using this word ...I have had NO one ever telling me they did not relate to it or were "offended" as though I were criticizing them instead of what do...READ THE MAP.

And I certainly have no intention of changing my mode of communication based on someone not liking the way I define an aspect.
Everyone has the right to just ignore anything or everything I say....if they choose.

To me, the word Challenge is valid for some squares....BRUTAL is another word for some squares....DEVASTATING is another word for some squares. And the conflict Is often between the native and the native. It's called internal conflict. Softening the language does not alter truth.

You know from the past, Frisiangal...I like using ALL my words!! :love::cool:
LIN
(you know what word I LOVE? Anthropomorphize ...... this way of seeing and experiencing energy one doesn't have oneself is very effective.)
 
Back
Top