piercethevale
Well-known member
"Out of Russia comes again the hope of the world": Edgar Cayce vs corporate media
I started writing the following early in the evening yesterday. I started with the intention of saying a few words about the constant onslaught, the relentless attack on president Trump and the Russians, as I can see it for the corporate paid horse s**t that it is.
I'm not an admirer of Trump not did I vote for him. I did predict his winning the election back in January of 2016 and that is posted here in this forum if anyone doubts that. I predicted his taking the whole pie when the experts, the pundits, gave him but a 2% chance of winning the primaries.
While I gave $600 to Senator Sanders campaign ...of which less than half I ever got a receipt for... which was just one of the many problems that Barry suffered due to Hillary's machinations ...I'm quite relieved that Trump got the office and not her.
I started writing the following for a posting at facebook but it grew and grew as I realized I had to cite sources so as to give explanations for many issues and my present stand on them...as those friends I do have on facebook are but very old friends from childhood and school days, family, and some fellow astrologers but there are a few that are also right wing Evangelistic Christians... there are a few that are long haired left wing radicals, some Hindus, a number of Roman Catholics [fathers' side of the family] maybe a Buddhist, or two, a few atheists, an agnostic or two, or three... got someone for just about everything... and something for just about everyone>
It grew too large to post on facebook. No one I know wants to read more than a few brief lines at a time while they're cruising the boards on fb. Me neither, I go there to socialize not get politicized, marginalized, etc. etc.
What I began writing and finished but never did nor will post on facebook [maybe just the link?] copied and pasted as follows,
I am still presently witnessing a continuous, unrelenting, effort by the established media, i.e. journalists, reporters, newscasters, editors, et al of the presently bought and sold out news sources, that until i was in my late 50's I had so deemed as to be mostly dependable and reliable and for the most part honest but always possessing personal integrity that while not always being personally pleasing at least it was honest and genuine as for being understandable to some greater or lesser degree. What I'm trying to say here is] that while it may not have always made good logical sense as to why anyone of the media took a stand or gave bias and favor to someone or some cause, or another. at least it always made sense as to regarding the person, or source, that gave the report and as to the particular subject of that news and. at one time, we could and did so in fact, trust those sources for honest facts, eye witness accounts and, not withstanding any aforementioned noticable yet understandable bias, impartial and discerning editorial evaluations and opinions of what "True News" there was.
Lately those same sources, or what has become of, or has replaced, them, Or, perhaps, have been seemingly forthright and noble, or most resolutely in an attempt to be perceived as such, in condemning social media participants for, both, creating and willfully distributing "fake news". These alleged fake news items being such, as for a few examples, that the Clintons' may have been directly responsible for the deaths of some five or six dozen people these last 40 years. that Barry Sotero, aka Barrack Obama, didn't have a legitimate birth certificate because He had't been born on U.S.A. soil and that He had actually been a "foreign student', or at the very least did so declare and pose as being that and knowingly did so unlawfully apply as being a foreign student to improve his chances of approval for admission to college and any financial grants that were offered and available here in the USA ....or if He was rightly eligible as for a reason that He was honest about his nationality status having been foreign then He is guilty of seeking and accepting the office of president of these United States, or that the events on Sept. 11th, 2001 were in fact not what the mainstream media and our own government have proclaimed them to be as to having been actually what happened, why, and how, or perhaps who was actually responsible for the planning and execution even though just about anyone that is lettered in any of the fields of science that one would consult regarding seeking an expertise explanation for the collapse of the "Twin Towers'" and building # 7 at the WTC, the successful breech of three walls in one attempt, the outermost being bunker hardened, of the Pentagon by a commercial jet airplane and the explanation that it "vaporized" inside those three walls immediately afterward. Or, perhaps, the rumor/belief that had Hillary "won" the election she would have had us at war with Russia before her term was over. I certainly believe it. Hillary and Bill Clinton have both been invited to a Bilderberg conference. Bill attended one in 1991. at least one that is known of, and He "won' the presidential election the following year, Hillary was invited and attended in 1997 when she was "First Lady". From what I have read every candidate for president that has ever attended that conference "won" the election for president...except for Hillary.
Donald Trump has never been known to attend one of those conferences and as such, despite a number of members of his Cabinet attending since Donald has took the office I don't believe that he is supportive of the plans for a NWO. Surely He must be an irritating thorn in their side.
As the Soviet Union was communist along with having so very few people of any notable wealth, and of such little wealth comparatively, Russia isn't a "friendly" to the NWO. Hence why the constant barrage from the "owned" media about some "ghastly", horrific, devious, threat Donald Trump and the Russians have been up to...even though what deals Hill and Bill had made with the Russians is known and documented. So what if Trump got some financing from a Russian because he needed a bail out? China has been buying up as much farmland in California as it can and owns, or is the majority stockholder, of the Union Oil Co. of California and China is yet still a Communist nation while the Soviet Union dissolved over thirty years ago and is no more.
Which brings me to the point of why I've written all of this so far. In 1944 just six months before the renowned clairvoyant, Edgar Cayce, passed away He gave an "open reading" at the Thirteenth Annual Congress of the Association for Research and Enlightenment, Inc. June 22, 1944 [A.R.E.] had a reading done by Mr. Cayce for their own "enlightenment". This reading, [3976-29], was conducted by Mrs. Cayce and she began with this directive to her husband while in trance. " Please take most particular notice that Edgar Cayce gave part of the following discourse as it pertains to "Russia". not the Soviet Union but rather "Russia". Russia was no more in 1944. It had long disappeared some 26 years prior. It was not an oversight, mistake or blunder of any kind. It was quite deliberate as for what Cayce said about Russia was entirely about it's future. That could only have meant that He was prophesying that the Soviet Union would fail and that Russia would re-emrge someday in the future. In the reading Edgar addressed seven different nations. "Russia was the first that He spoke of.
[From Jeffrey Furst's book, "Edgar Cayce's Story of Jesus, Chapter 12 The Church of Laodicea - Lucius, Summation - Several Readings Concerning Jesus". The following is part of the "Summation" and is a selective excerpt of the reading which I noted above.]
"Mrs. Cayce: It has been indicated through this channel that much might be given regarding what vibrations of nations, as individuals, might mean. You will give such information concerning these vibrations and their relations to the spirit of various nations, particularly in connection with the seven sins and twelve virtues in the human family, which will be helpful to us as an organization and as individuals in our attempt to be channels of blessing to our fellow men. You will then answer questions which may be submitted, as I ask them.
Mr. Cayce: When there came about the periods of mans' evolution in the earth, what was given then as to why man must be separated into tongues, into nations, into groups? 'Lest they in their follish wisdom defy God'. What is here then intimated? That man, seeking his own gratification of the lusts of the flesh, might even in the earth defy God. With what, then, has man been endowed by his Creator? All that might be necessary for each individual soul-entity to be a companion with God. And that is Gods' desire toward man.
Then when man began to defy God in the earth and the confusion arose which is represented in the Tower of Babel - these are representations of what was then the basis, the beginnings of nations. Nations were set up then in various portions of the land, and each group, one stronger than another, set about to seek their own gratifications."
At this point Edgar went on about how nations have come and gone and each had failed in some way succumbing to the flesh. He continued on at a later point with; [ibid.] "
"...Then, just as in the days of old, the nature of the flesh, human flesh and its natures, has not changed, but the spirit maketh alive. The truth maketh one free. Just as man has done throughout the ages, so in the present, as one takes those of the various nations as have seen the light and have, through one form or another, sought to establish as the ideal of that nation, of that people, some word, some symbol that has and does represent those peoples in those days of the fathers of the present land called America. What is the spirit of America? Most individuals proudly boast 'freedom'. Freedom of what? When ye bind mens' hearts and minds through various ways and manners, does it give them freedom of speech? Freedom of worship? Freedom from want? Not unless those basic principles are applicable throughout the tenets and lines as has been set, but with that principle freedom. For God meant man to be free and thus gave man will, a will even to defy God. GOD has not willed that any soul should perish, but hath with every trial or temptation prepared a way of escape. ... Those nations who have taken those vows that man shall be free should also take those vows 'He shall know the truth and the truth shall make him free'."
Cayce went on about how man did once live to be a thousand, or more, years old and how with the passing of time and mans' increasing desire for self gratification and succumbing to them lowered life expectancy more and more. He then added that everyone should [ibid.]
..."Look to the nations where the span of life has been extended from sixty to eighty-four years. You will judge who is serving God. These are judgments. These are the signs to those who seek to know, , who will study the heavens, who will analyze the elements, who will know the heart of man, they that seek to know the will of the Father for themselves answer 'Lord, here am I, use me, send me where I am needed'."
Cayce continued on and spoke of the conflict at hand [W.W. II] and that there were two principles in conflict with one another and how there arose a cry for help for reason given as 'mans' heritage of freedom might be taken away', but then asked "By whom" and then noted that it would be taken away by one of those two principles and then identified them. [ibid.]
"There are those two principles, two conflicting forces in the earth today: the prince of this world, and the Principle that says to every soul, 'Fear not, I have overcome the world and the prince of the world hath nothing on me'. Can ye say that? Ye must! That is thy hope; that 'The prince of this world, Satan, that old serpent, hath no part in any desire of my mind, my heart, my body, that I do not control in the direction it shall take'. These are the things, those are the principles.
What then of nations? In Russia there comes the hope of the world, not as that sometimes termed of the Communistic, of the Bolshevistic; no. But freedom, freedom that each man will live for his fellow man! The principle has been born. It will take years fr it to be crystallized but out of Russia comes again the hope of the world. Guided by what? That friendship with the nation that hath even set on its present monetary unit 'In God We Trust'. Do ye use that in thine own heart when you pay your just debts? Do ye use that in thy prayer when ye send thy missionaries to other lands? 'I give it, for in God we trust'?
In the application of these principles, in those forms and manners in which the nations of the earth have and do measure to those in their activities, yea, to be sure, America may boast, but rather is that principle being forgotten when such is the case, and that is the sin of America."
Cayce continued on and adressed the sin of England, the sin of Italy, but spoke only of Rome, the sin of India, which by my evaluation is not nearly so much a sin, but rather self sacrifice as Cayce said the sin is SELF, but also added ''and leave the 'ish' off - just self."
I do hope you caught what Cayce said about Russia being the ''hope of the world". and that it needs to have and maintain freindship with the United States so as to be guided successfuly.
Keep in mind that Snowden, who was looking out for all our interests that hinge on freedom was offered sanctuary by only one nation and it sure the heck wasn't this one that boasts of fredom and is the measure that Cayce spoke of and failed just as Cayce admonished in that "...rather is that principle being forgotten when such is the case."?
I have found myself saying to someone, somewhere, almost everday for the last year and a half that Russia is not our [the U.S.A.'s] enemy. Yet everyday I see yet another newscast spinning yarns about a perpetration of evil that has came from, did come from, will surely come from Russia.
That unrest in the Ukraine has been revealed to have been C.I.A. instigated and supplied... all to vex and make Russia appear as an ogre of agression and greed, yet the gre of agression andgreed is actually a different nation busily making and giving excuses for running amok in the desert lands Soputh of the lands of the Cossacks. Trying to grab all the oil reserving it for itself and it gluttinous appetite for energy, which was induced and maintained by those that would profit greatly by feeding it.
Fake news being spun and spread in the social media? IF by that it is meant that media in which society has no part other than to watch and be led on to believe as truth? ...and all thye while filling your heads with the notiion that if an election becomes suspect to tampering then you can da** well blame the Russians...and later will we be told we can just blame ourselves as well for not letting our country get into a war with Russia?
We probably will if we keep electing to office those that come from the tired, old, corrupted, politcal parties that have also been bought and sold to the ones that own all our traditional media.
Keep the internet nuetral, keep it unrestricted, and you had all best remember what my Free Quaker granddad, soldier in the Virginia Regiment, from 1778 to the Battle of Yorktown, said back in the day, "keep your powder dry".
There will be more false flags perpetrated in order to get the Second Amendment abolished, learn to discern the difference. A very good friend of my sisters was in Las Vegas at the time of the mass slaughter some months ago. She had rented a room a couple of floors below that of the alleged shooters' and facing the same direction, a window on the same scene below and she says the rapid fire was coming from a floor, a window, below her own.
I believe the NWO was depending on Obama to get the gun grab completed and His failure to do so along with Trump beating the approved candidate has got a lot of people very agitated, angry, and impatient by now so we had all best serve our mutual interest in maintaining what freedom still remains here in the USA by speaking out anytime someone wants to tell you some reason why Russia is our threat by speaking louder, saying "Russia is not our enemy" and remember the words of Steven Van Zandt, "...I ain't no Democrat, sure ain't no Republican, I believe in one Party, the Party of Freedom" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUJCI-GGHGI
For those of you that might need to revise your opinion of Putin, [which is the majority of people that I know personally] those of you that believe He has aims on destroying America, or Christianity, or any thing spiritually oriented at all... you had best watch this following video, for which I give a link to. Don't fret as it is very brief and you can go back to whatever it is you have got pressing you and it should, in fact, help free up some time for you. You won't have to spend time wondering and worrying about the fellow and what He might be up to.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bee70unn9aM
I love glasnost.
I started writing the following early in the evening yesterday. I started with the intention of saying a few words about the constant onslaught, the relentless attack on president Trump and the Russians, as I can see it for the corporate paid horse s**t that it is.
I'm not an admirer of Trump not did I vote for him. I did predict his winning the election back in January of 2016 and that is posted here in this forum if anyone doubts that. I predicted his taking the whole pie when the experts, the pundits, gave him but a 2% chance of winning the primaries.
While I gave $600 to Senator Sanders campaign ...of which less than half I ever got a receipt for... which was just one of the many problems that Barry suffered due to Hillary's machinations ...I'm quite relieved that Trump got the office and not her.
I started writing the following for a posting at facebook but it grew and grew as I realized I had to cite sources so as to give explanations for many issues and my present stand on them...as those friends I do have on facebook are but very old friends from childhood and school days, family, and some fellow astrologers but there are a few that are also right wing Evangelistic Christians... there are a few that are long haired left wing radicals, some Hindus, a number of Roman Catholics [fathers' side of the family] maybe a Buddhist, or two, a few atheists, an agnostic or two, or three... got someone for just about everything... and something for just about everyone>
It grew too large to post on facebook. No one I know wants to read more than a few brief lines at a time while they're cruising the boards on fb. Me neither, I go there to socialize not get politicized, marginalized, etc. etc.
What I began writing and finished but never did nor will post on facebook [maybe just the link?] copied and pasted as follows,
I am still presently witnessing a continuous, unrelenting, effort by the established media, i.e. journalists, reporters, newscasters, editors, et al of the presently bought and sold out news sources, that until i was in my late 50's I had so deemed as to be mostly dependable and reliable and for the most part honest but always possessing personal integrity that while not always being personally pleasing at least it was honest and genuine as for being understandable to some greater or lesser degree. What I'm trying to say here is] that while it may not have always made good logical sense as to why anyone of the media took a stand or gave bias and favor to someone or some cause, or another. at least it always made sense as to regarding the person, or source, that gave the report and as to the particular subject of that news and. at one time, we could and did so in fact, trust those sources for honest facts, eye witness accounts and, not withstanding any aforementioned noticable yet understandable bias, impartial and discerning editorial evaluations and opinions of what "True News" there was.
Lately those same sources, or what has become of, or has replaced, them, Or, perhaps, have been seemingly forthright and noble, or most resolutely in an attempt to be perceived as such, in condemning social media participants for, both, creating and willfully distributing "fake news". These alleged fake news items being such, as for a few examples, that the Clintons' may have been directly responsible for the deaths of some five or six dozen people these last 40 years. that Barry Sotero, aka Barrack Obama, didn't have a legitimate birth certificate because He had't been born on U.S.A. soil and that He had actually been a "foreign student', or at the very least did so declare and pose as being that and knowingly did so unlawfully apply as being a foreign student to improve his chances of approval for admission to college and any financial grants that were offered and available here in the USA ....or if He was rightly eligible as for a reason that He was honest about his nationality status having been foreign then He is guilty of seeking and accepting the office of president of these United States, or that the events on Sept. 11th, 2001 were in fact not what the mainstream media and our own government have proclaimed them to be as to having been actually what happened, why, and how, or perhaps who was actually responsible for the planning and execution even though just about anyone that is lettered in any of the fields of science that one would consult regarding seeking an expertise explanation for the collapse of the "Twin Towers'" and building # 7 at the WTC, the successful breech of three walls in one attempt, the outermost being bunker hardened, of the Pentagon by a commercial jet airplane and the explanation that it "vaporized" inside those three walls immediately afterward. Or, perhaps, the rumor/belief that had Hillary "won" the election she would have had us at war with Russia before her term was over. I certainly believe it. Hillary and Bill Clinton have both been invited to a Bilderberg conference. Bill attended one in 1991. at least one that is known of, and He "won' the presidential election the following year, Hillary was invited and attended in 1997 when she was "First Lady". From what I have read every candidate for president that has ever attended that conference "won" the election for president...except for Hillary.
Donald Trump has never been known to attend one of those conferences and as such, despite a number of members of his Cabinet attending since Donald has took the office I don't believe that he is supportive of the plans for a NWO. Surely He must be an irritating thorn in their side.
As the Soviet Union was communist along with having so very few people of any notable wealth, and of such little wealth comparatively, Russia isn't a "friendly" to the NWO. Hence why the constant barrage from the "owned" media about some "ghastly", horrific, devious, threat Donald Trump and the Russians have been up to...even though what deals Hill and Bill had made with the Russians is known and documented. So what if Trump got some financing from a Russian because he needed a bail out? China has been buying up as much farmland in California as it can and owns, or is the majority stockholder, of the Union Oil Co. of California and China is yet still a Communist nation while the Soviet Union dissolved over thirty years ago and is no more.
Which brings me to the point of why I've written all of this so far. In 1944 just six months before the renowned clairvoyant, Edgar Cayce, passed away He gave an "open reading" at the Thirteenth Annual Congress of the Association for Research and Enlightenment, Inc. June 22, 1944 [A.R.E.] had a reading done by Mr. Cayce for their own "enlightenment". This reading, [3976-29], was conducted by Mrs. Cayce and she began with this directive to her husband while in trance. " Please take most particular notice that Edgar Cayce gave part of the following discourse as it pertains to "Russia". not the Soviet Union but rather "Russia". Russia was no more in 1944. It had long disappeared some 26 years prior. It was not an oversight, mistake or blunder of any kind. It was quite deliberate as for what Cayce said about Russia was entirely about it's future. That could only have meant that He was prophesying that the Soviet Union would fail and that Russia would re-emrge someday in the future. In the reading Edgar addressed seven different nations. "Russia was the first that He spoke of.
[From Jeffrey Furst's book, "Edgar Cayce's Story of Jesus, Chapter 12 The Church of Laodicea - Lucius, Summation - Several Readings Concerning Jesus". The following is part of the "Summation" and is a selective excerpt of the reading which I noted above.]
"Mrs. Cayce: It has been indicated through this channel that much might be given regarding what vibrations of nations, as individuals, might mean. You will give such information concerning these vibrations and their relations to the spirit of various nations, particularly in connection with the seven sins and twelve virtues in the human family, which will be helpful to us as an organization and as individuals in our attempt to be channels of blessing to our fellow men. You will then answer questions which may be submitted, as I ask them.
Mr. Cayce: When there came about the periods of mans' evolution in the earth, what was given then as to why man must be separated into tongues, into nations, into groups? 'Lest they in their follish wisdom defy God'. What is here then intimated? That man, seeking his own gratification of the lusts of the flesh, might even in the earth defy God. With what, then, has man been endowed by his Creator? All that might be necessary for each individual soul-entity to be a companion with God. And that is Gods' desire toward man.
Then when man began to defy God in the earth and the confusion arose which is represented in the Tower of Babel - these are representations of what was then the basis, the beginnings of nations. Nations were set up then in various portions of the land, and each group, one stronger than another, set about to seek their own gratifications."
At this point Edgar went on about how nations have come and gone and each had failed in some way succumbing to the flesh. He continued on at a later point with; [ibid.] "
"...Then, just as in the days of old, the nature of the flesh, human flesh and its natures, has not changed, but the spirit maketh alive. The truth maketh one free. Just as man has done throughout the ages, so in the present, as one takes those of the various nations as have seen the light and have, through one form or another, sought to establish as the ideal of that nation, of that people, some word, some symbol that has and does represent those peoples in those days of the fathers of the present land called America. What is the spirit of America? Most individuals proudly boast 'freedom'. Freedom of what? When ye bind mens' hearts and minds through various ways and manners, does it give them freedom of speech? Freedom of worship? Freedom from want? Not unless those basic principles are applicable throughout the tenets and lines as has been set, but with that principle freedom. For God meant man to be free and thus gave man will, a will even to defy God. GOD has not willed that any soul should perish, but hath with every trial or temptation prepared a way of escape. ... Those nations who have taken those vows that man shall be free should also take those vows 'He shall know the truth and the truth shall make him free'."
Cayce went on about how man did once live to be a thousand, or more, years old and how with the passing of time and mans' increasing desire for self gratification and succumbing to them lowered life expectancy more and more. He then added that everyone should [ibid.]
..."Look to the nations where the span of life has been extended from sixty to eighty-four years. You will judge who is serving God. These are judgments. These are the signs to those who seek to know, , who will study the heavens, who will analyze the elements, who will know the heart of man, they that seek to know the will of the Father for themselves answer 'Lord, here am I, use me, send me where I am needed'."
Cayce continued on and spoke of the conflict at hand [W.W. II] and that there were two principles in conflict with one another and how there arose a cry for help for reason given as 'mans' heritage of freedom might be taken away', but then asked "By whom" and then noted that it would be taken away by one of those two principles and then identified them. [ibid.]
"There are those two principles, two conflicting forces in the earth today: the prince of this world, and the Principle that says to every soul, 'Fear not, I have overcome the world and the prince of the world hath nothing on me'. Can ye say that? Ye must! That is thy hope; that 'The prince of this world, Satan, that old serpent, hath no part in any desire of my mind, my heart, my body, that I do not control in the direction it shall take'. These are the things, those are the principles.
What then of nations? In Russia there comes the hope of the world, not as that sometimes termed of the Communistic, of the Bolshevistic; no. But freedom, freedom that each man will live for his fellow man! The principle has been born. It will take years fr it to be crystallized but out of Russia comes again the hope of the world. Guided by what? That friendship with the nation that hath even set on its present monetary unit 'In God We Trust'. Do ye use that in thine own heart when you pay your just debts? Do ye use that in thy prayer when ye send thy missionaries to other lands? 'I give it, for in God we trust'?
In the application of these principles, in those forms and manners in which the nations of the earth have and do measure to those in their activities, yea, to be sure, America may boast, but rather is that principle being forgotten when such is the case, and that is the sin of America."
Cayce continued on and adressed the sin of England, the sin of Italy, but spoke only of Rome, the sin of India, which by my evaluation is not nearly so much a sin, but rather self sacrifice as Cayce said the sin is SELF, but also added ''and leave the 'ish' off - just self."
I do hope you caught what Cayce said about Russia being the ''hope of the world". and that it needs to have and maintain freindship with the United States so as to be guided successfuly.
Keep in mind that Snowden, who was looking out for all our interests that hinge on freedom was offered sanctuary by only one nation and it sure the heck wasn't this one that boasts of fredom and is the measure that Cayce spoke of and failed just as Cayce admonished in that "...rather is that principle being forgotten when such is the case."?
I have found myself saying to someone, somewhere, almost everday for the last year and a half that Russia is not our [the U.S.A.'s] enemy. Yet everyday I see yet another newscast spinning yarns about a perpetration of evil that has came from, did come from, will surely come from Russia.
That unrest in the Ukraine has been revealed to have been C.I.A. instigated and supplied... all to vex and make Russia appear as an ogre of agression and greed, yet the gre of agression andgreed is actually a different nation busily making and giving excuses for running amok in the desert lands Soputh of the lands of the Cossacks. Trying to grab all the oil reserving it for itself and it gluttinous appetite for energy, which was induced and maintained by those that would profit greatly by feeding it.
Fake news being spun and spread in the social media? IF by that it is meant that media in which society has no part other than to watch and be led on to believe as truth? ...and all thye while filling your heads with the notiion that if an election becomes suspect to tampering then you can da** well blame the Russians...and later will we be told we can just blame ourselves as well for not letting our country get into a war with Russia?
We probably will if we keep electing to office those that come from the tired, old, corrupted, politcal parties that have also been bought and sold to the ones that own all our traditional media.
Keep the internet nuetral, keep it unrestricted, and you had all best remember what my Free Quaker granddad, soldier in the Virginia Regiment, from 1778 to the Battle of Yorktown, said back in the day, "keep your powder dry".
There will be more false flags perpetrated in order to get the Second Amendment abolished, learn to discern the difference. A very good friend of my sisters was in Las Vegas at the time of the mass slaughter some months ago. She had rented a room a couple of floors below that of the alleged shooters' and facing the same direction, a window on the same scene below and she says the rapid fire was coming from a floor, a window, below her own.
I believe the NWO was depending on Obama to get the gun grab completed and His failure to do so along with Trump beating the approved candidate has got a lot of people very agitated, angry, and impatient by now so we had all best serve our mutual interest in maintaining what freedom still remains here in the USA by speaking out anytime someone wants to tell you some reason why Russia is our threat by speaking louder, saying "Russia is not our enemy" and remember the words of Steven Van Zandt, "...I ain't no Democrat, sure ain't no Republican, I believe in one Party, the Party of Freedom" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUJCI-GGHGI
For those of you that might need to revise your opinion of Putin, [which is the majority of people that I know personally] those of you that believe He has aims on destroying America, or Christianity, or any thing spiritually oriented at all... you had best watch this following video, for which I give a link to. Don't fret as it is very brief and you can go back to whatever it is you have got pressing you and it should, in fact, help free up some time for you. You won't have to spend time wondering and worrying about the fellow and what He might be up to.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bee70unn9aM
I love glasnost.
Last edited: