Planetary temperament vs. essential dignity schemes

Astrologers' Community

Help Support Astrologers' Community:

Dima Gur

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 3, 2019
Messages
120
Hi everyone,

Have been considering lately some models of planetary temperament and affinity between a planet’s innate temperament to sign placement, according to element.

Created a table with all of the possible placements, in order to check which combinations are more and which are less beneficial for the planets.

40jywu3.png



I’ve used the most popular and widespread scheme of planetary temperament:
Mars/Sun – Hot+Dry
Moon/Venus – Cold+Wet
Merc/Sat – Cold+Dry
Jupiter – Hot+Wet
---
Fire - Hot+Dry
Water - Cold+Wet
Earth - Cold+Dry
Air - Hot+Wet

Example for how to use the table:
Mars is a hot and dry planet, so whenever Mars is in a fire sign there’s affinity between Mars’ temperament and him being in Aries/Leo/Sag. Thus, mars is ‘boosted’ and can act more naturally and organically, you can say. I consider it as a form of accidental dignity.
The contrary is also true. Since Mars is hot and dry and water signs are cold and wet, Mars would feel hampered in Cancer/Scorpio/Pisces. I would consider it as a form of accidental debility.
This model gets more interesting when you combine it with essential dignity, and especially domicile, exaltation and triplicity. All manner of interaction ensues, in such a way.
For example, Mars in Scorpio is both in domicile and in triplicity dignity, but mars would be accidentally weak according to the temperament condition. So you get a mixed bag of sorts.

With other planets, like Mercury for example, you get a strong boost via both essential dignity and temperament. Say Mercury in Virgo (Mercury being cold and dry, in a cold and dry sign, and in domicile plus exaltation).
Or strong debility according to both conditions, like in the case of Jupiter in Capricorn (Jupiter being hot and wet, in a cold and dry sign, plus the fall condition in Capricorn).

* I use the Hellenistic model of triplicity scoring; [+3] to all three planets
* And a 'thank you' is owed to Charles Obert, who was first to make me aware of these interesting interactions, through his book “Using Dignity in Astrology”

Also posted about this, more in-depth, on my blog.
You're welcome to check it out:
https://www.gurastro.com/2022/10/planet-sign-affinity-according-to.html

---

Thoughts and opinions would be welcome.
 
Hi everyone,

Have been considering lately some models of planetary temperament and affinity between a planet’s innate temperament to sign placement, according to element.

Created a table with all of the possible placements, in order to check which combinations are more and which are less beneficial for the planets.

40jywu3.png



I’ve used the most popular and widespread scheme of planetary temperament:
Mars/Sun – Hot+Dry
Moon/Venus – Cold+Wet
Merc/Sat – Cold+Dry
Jupiter – Hot+Wet
---
Fire - Hot+Dry
Water - Cold+Wet
Earth - Cold+Dry
Air - Hot+Wet

Example for how to use the table:
Mars is a hot and dry planet, so whenever Mars is in a fire sign there’s affinity between Mars’ temperament and him being in Aries/Leo/Sag. Thus, mars is ‘boosted’ and can act more naturally and organically, you can say. I consider it as a form of accidental dignity.
The contrary is also true. Since Mars is hot and dry and water signs are cold and wet, Mars would feel hampered in Cancer/Scorpio/Pisces. I would consider it as a form of accidental debility.
This model gets more interesting when you combine it with essential dignity, and especially domicile, exaltation and triplicity. All manner of interaction ensues, in such a way.
For example, Mars in Scorpio is both in domicile and in triplicity dignity, but mars would be accidentally weak according to the temperament condition. So you get a mixed bag of sorts.

With other planets, like Mercury for example, you get a strong boost via both essential dignity and temperament. Say Mercury in Virgo (Mercury being cold and dry, in a cold and dry sign, and in domicile plus exaltation).
Or strong debility according to both conditions, like in the case of Jupiter in Capricorn (Jupiter being hot and wet, in a cold and dry sign, plus the fall condition in Capricorn).

* I use the Hellenistic model of triplicity scoring; [+3] to all three planets
* And a 'thank you' is owed to Charles Obert, who was first to make me aware of these interesting interactions, through his book “Using Dignity in Astrology”

Also posted about this, more in-depth, on my blog.
You're welcome to check it out:
https://www.gurastro.com/2022/10/planet-sign-affinity-according-to.html

---

Thoughts and opinions would be welcome.
Very interesting. Thank you for this!
In reading the table, could you please tell me which planet is referred to as Planet 1 and Planet 2 in the Good, Average and Bad influences columns?
For example, with the Sun, what is Planet 1 and what is Planet 2?
 
Ilene,
Thanks for your words and input.

It's actually meant in such a way that for the Sun it's good to be in Leo or in Aries, temperament wise (and also in terms of esst. dignity).
I guess the titles of the table-columns should have been phrased as: 'good for the planet (option-1)' and 'good for the planet (option-2)'.
The planet being the one on the left (in the rows section of the table).

Sorry for the confusion.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top