I'm not frankly worried about AI taking over my astrology job. I'm here as a volunteer.
It's more like the AI astrology material I've seen is rally bland, and seemingly designed to not offend. I don't want to offend anybody in a horoscope reading, but sometimes we have to tell someone the truth as we see it, and that information can come across as harsh and judgmental to the recipient. AI seems to sugar-coat its readings.
I've seen a couple of posts here that I think are written by AI even though the source is an actual person. They are well-written. The text runs smoothly. And they are very vanilla-ish.
It's more like the AI astrology material I've seen is rally bland, and seemingly designed to not offend. I don't want to offend anybody in a horoscope reading, but sometimes we have to tell someone the truth as we see it, and that information can come across as harsh and judgmental to the recipient. AI seems to sugar-coat its readings.
I've seen a couple of posts here that I think are written by AI even though the source is an actual person. They are well-written. The text runs smoothly. And they are very vanilla-ish.
