In intelligence-gathering and propaganda terms, an "asset" is a sympathizer or supporter of a foreign-nation's own subversive political goals. An asset will speak out in favor of the foreign nation's goals to the point of sowing discord at home or with one's allies.
Russia has long seen Donald Trump as an asset. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/29/trump-russia-asset-claims-former-kgb-spy-new-book
https://slate.com/news-and-politics...t-election-intelligence-community-report.html
Russia did not invade Ukraine during Trump's presidency: not because they saw him as strong, but because they thought if they stoked his ego and he got re-elected, he would pull the US out of NATO. They also saw American divisiveness over Trump as furthering the Russian goal of destabilizing its arch-enemy, the US.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine has turned many far-right Americans against Russia and Vladimir Putin, even though they previously supported Trump's view that Russia was benign. A recent poll showed that 77% of Republicans now think Putin "is a murderous dictator."
https://www.politico.com/news/magaz...nvicing-most-republicans-trump-putin-00023845
But this still leaves a percentage of the far right as supporters of Vladimir Putin. Many are conspiracy theorists believe that pro-Ukrainian news media publish fake pictures of bodies in the streets of Bucha; and that toxic Ukrainian "biolabs" were real, for example.
In that sense, pro-Russia conspiracy theorists are "Russian assets." They are assets because Russia doesn't have to pay its own intelligence operatives to sow pro-Russian propaganda in the media when Americans will circulate pro-Russia opinions themselves. Public comments of America's Russian assets are shown on Russian state television.
Of course, other countries can freely sow disinformation abroad to their own political advantage when their propaganda is taken up in other places. Charles Lindbergh, as well as the Duke and Duchess of Windsor, were German assets in their day. Marine LePen is a Russian asset. Her party borrowed heavily from Russian banks and she advocates pulling France out of NATO.
My concern with this thread is with Russian assets who support Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine.
Russia has long seen Donald Trump as an asset. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/29/trump-russia-asset-claims-former-kgb-spy-new-book
https://slate.com/news-and-politics...t-election-intelligence-community-report.html
Russia did not invade Ukraine during Trump's presidency: not because they saw him as strong, but because they thought if they stoked his ego and he got re-elected, he would pull the US out of NATO. They also saw American divisiveness over Trump as furthering the Russian goal of destabilizing its arch-enemy, the US.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine has turned many far-right Americans against Russia and Vladimir Putin, even though they previously supported Trump's view that Russia was benign. A recent poll showed that 77% of Republicans now think Putin "is a murderous dictator."
https://www.politico.com/news/magaz...nvicing-most-republicans-trump-putin-00023845
But this still leaves a percentage of the far right as supporters of Vladimir Putin. Many are conspiracy theorists believe that pro-Ukrainian news media publish fake pictures of bodies in the streets of Bucha; and that toxic Ukrainian "biolabs" were real, for example.
In that sense, pro-Russia conspiracy theorists are "Russian assets." They are assets because Russia doesn't have to pay its own intelligence operatives to sow pro-Russian propaganda in the media when Americans will circulate pro-Russia opinions themselves. Public comments of America's Russian assets are shown on Russian state television.
Of course, other countries can freely sow disinformation abroad to their own political advantage when their propaganda is taken up in other places. Charles Lindbergh, as well as the Duke and Duchess of Windsor, were German assets in their day. Marine LePen is a Russian asset. Her party borrowed heavily from Russian banks and she advocates pulling France out of NATO.
My concern with this thread is with Russian assets who support Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine.
Last edited: